Stolen Votes ~ How Soldiers and Civilians Lost Their One Voice, Their One Vote...
From The Left Coaster -- Monday May 21, 2007 By Mary"....the Voting Rights Section after learning his craft suppressing black votes in Georgia."
".....and not someone who has been part of Karl Rove's multi-year voter suppression conspiracy. No more Rove clones allowed near our elections."
A BUZZFLASH INTERVIEW Greg Palast, Author of Armed Madhouse, on How Rove May Have Already Stolen the 2008 Election....Submitted by BuzzFlash on Thu, 05/17/2007
"By sending letters to the homes of soldiers, marked "do not forward." When they came back undelivered, they said: Aha! Illegal voter registered from a false address. And when their ballot came in from Fallujah, it was challenged. The soldier didn’t know it. Their vote was lost. Over half a million votes were challenged and lost by the Republicans -- absentee ballots. Three million voters who went to the polls found themselves challenged by the Republicans. This was not a small operation. It was a multi-million dollar, wholesale theft operation."
3 Comments:
http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/TruthIsAllFAQResponse.htm
Smoking Gun: The Final National Exit Poll
The Final 2004 National Exit Poll (NEP) is the smoking gun of election fraud. The NEP has always been matched to the recorded vote on the assumption that it is accurate. But it is a fact that in every election millions of votes are cast but never counted and most of them (70-80%) are Democratic. Therefore, it is immediately obvious that the recorded vote did not reflect the true vote. Uncounted votes are a combination of spoiled, absentee and provisional ballots. Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004 are obvious examples. In addition to these uncounted votes, we will show that millions of votes must have been switched from Kerry to Bush.
The Final NEP was forced to match the recorded vote by adjusting the “How Voted in 2000” weights to Bush 43/Gore 37%. The Bush 43% weighting is impossible since it implies that 52.59mm of the recorded 2004 total of 122.3mm voted for Bush in 2000. But this is 2.13mm more than his 50.46mm recorded vote. And it’s 3.9mm more than the 48.7mm Bush 2000 voters who were living in 2004. Furthermore, since some Bush 2000 voters did not vote in 2004, his true weighting had to be lower than 39.8%.
If we assume a 95% turnout (46.27mm) of Bush 2000 voters in 2004, the Bush weighting is reduced to a feasible 37.8% (46.27/122.3). Since impossible weights were required in order to match the recorded vote, the only logical conclusion is that the recorded vote must also have been impossible.
The weights become Bush 37/Kerry 37.4% when they are calculated based on the Census 2004 total of 125.7 million votes cast (assuming a 95% turnout and 3.0% mortality rate).
Amazingly disturbing! So, in your opinion, is this similiar to any other elections that data was available for? And if so, how can the comparison from the past be used to visually show (graph) where the most accurate data and the opposing -- incorrect data..run parallel to eachother? Can a graph be created out of your data? I am a visual person and get more out of visual aids and color charts. Can you put the numbers to a chart? Can this information be used to prevent future voter fraud? Has the MSM picked up on and printed this data? Thank you Truthisall for digging where no one else seems to want to. What a read!
Sorry truthisall, meant question about past election data..going back before 2000, as far back as 60s, 70s 80s or 90s? Can you see the data from back then? And if so, can you apply those numbers to a chart? Thank you.
Post a Comment
<< Home